NuVia has one of the most compelling pitches in the entire dental implant industry.
NuVia has the best pitch in the dental implant industry: permanent zirconia teeth in 24 hours.
What NuVia charges per arch for permanent zirconia in 24 hours
Permanent zirconia teeth in twenty-four hours. No temporary dentures. No waiting six months with plastic teeth. No “teeth in a day” bait-and-switch where you find out later the teeth are acrylic. Just real zirconia. Delivered the day after surgery. Done. It is real. It works. And we respect what they have built.
But here is the question every patient eventually asks. Is twenty-two to thirty-two thousand dollars per arch worth it?
That is forty-four to sixty-four thousand dollars for a full mouth. And while the speed is genuinely impressive, most patients are paying for convenience, not better dentistry. If you just got quoted by NuVia, or you are comparing them to ClearChoice and Aspen, this article walks you through every alternative with honest numbers and real context.
NuVia does something no other US chain does. They skip the temporary phase entirely.
Not marketing fluff. NuVia's in-house CAD/CAM lab mills zirconia overnight. The process is clinically sound and their success rates are high.
An oral surgeon places your implants. A restorative dentist takes digital scans. Then the magic happens. Their in-house lab mills a custom zirconia bridge overnight using CAD/CAM technology.
They attach your permanent zirconia teeth. Done. No temporary phase. No waiting. No plastic teeth.
From a clinical perspective, this is impressive. Zirconia is rigid. It gives your implants stable support during healing. And because there is no flexible acrylic temporary putting micro-movement on the implants, some dentists believe the healing is actually better.
Plus, NuVia includes IV sedation administered by a Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist. That is a higher standard than many general dental offices.
SERVICE |
COST PER ARCH |
FULL MOUTH |
|---|---|---|
NuVia doesn’t offer lower-tier pricing. This is their only option. You’re paying for speed, specialization, and the permanent-in-24-hours guarantee.
So the question is not whether the procedure works. It does. The question is whether twenty-four hours of convenience is worth a twenty to fifty thousand dollar premium over getting a similar result somewhere else.
If you finance $50,000 over 10 years at 12% interest:
"Your mouth changes during healing. Gums shrink. Bone settles. A permanent bridge fitted on day 2 is based on a mouth that hasn't finished changing."
Your mouth changes during healing. Gums shrink. Bone settles. The bite shifts slightly. This is normal — it happens to everyone.
NuVia fabricates your permanent zirconia bridge **before** healing completes. The fit on day 2 is based on a mouth that hasn’t finished changing.
Most patients do great. NuVia‘s success rates are strong. But some patients need adjustments, refinements, or even replacement bridges down the road because the fit changes as tissue settles.
“Permanent in 24 hours” means the material is permanent. The fit may evolve.
NuVia doesn’t negotiate. They don’t offer lower-tier materials. They don’t have a “budget option.”
If $22,000–$32,000 per arch isn’t in your budget, NuVia isn’t your answer. Period.
Same-day loading requires strong bone. If you need bone grafts, sinus lifts, or have poor bone density, you might not be a candidate for immediate zirconia placement. In that case, NuVia‘s 24-hour advantage disappears and you’re still paying premium prices.
*Based on each provider's highest tier package
OPTION |
SINGLE ARCH |
FULL MOUTH |
TIMELINE |
TEMP PHASE? |
SPECIALIST? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$22,000–$32,000
| |||||
Every other chain (ClearChoice, Aspen, most local dentists) gives you temporary acrylic or PMMA teeth first. You live with them for 3–6 months while healing. Then you get permanent teeth.
NuVia skips this entirely. You get zirconia on day 2. That eliminates:
– Living with plastic teeth
– Multiple adjustment appointments
– The risk of temporary breakage or staining
– The psychological weight of “waiting for your real teeth”
Zirconia is rigid. It provides stable support to implants during healing. Some dentists believe this actually improves healing outcomes because the implants don’t experience micro-movement from flexible acrylic temporaries.
NuVia mills zirconia bridges in their own lab overnight. Most dental labs take weeks. This is a genuine operational advantage.
NuVia includes IV sedation administered by a Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist. That’s a higher standard than many general dental offices.
The catch: ClearChoice costs MORE than NuVia but gives you temporary teeth first. Their “teeth in a day” marketing is technically true but misleading — you get acrylic temporaries, not permanent zirconia.
Why would anyone choose ClearChoice over NuVia? Location. NuVia has fewer centers. If there’s a ClearChoice near you and no NuVia, you might not have a choice.
Aspen Dental advertises lower prices (~$20,000 per arch), but:
– Quality varies wildly by location
– Most dentists are general practitioners
– Temporaries, grafts, and upgrades cost extra
– Same private equity ownership as ClearChoice
Vs. NuVia: Aspen might cost less on paper but you’re not getting the 24-hour permanent teeth. You’re getting a variable experience at a general dentistry chain.
A local oral surgeon places implants. You heal for 3–6 months. A prosthodontist designs and fits your permanent zirconia teeth.
Reality: This often costs $25,000–$40,000 per arch by the time you add up separate bills. And you’re managing multiple appointments with multiple providers.
Vs. NuVia: You’re paying similar (or higher) prices and waiting 6+ months for permanent teeth. The only advantage is local convenience.
Cost: $10,000–$15,000 per arch
Trade-off: 12–24 month timeline because students work slowly
Quality: Good, under faculty supervision
Vs. NuVia: You’re saving $10k–$20k per arch but adding a year or more to the process. If speed matters, this isn’t your answer.
At SOTA Dental in Cancun, Tijuana, Los Algodones, and Playa del Carmen, you do not get permanent zirconia in twenty-four hours. You get something else.
You get fixed PMMA temporary teeth on day one. PMMA is a high-grade acrylic that is stronger and more aesthetic than typical US temporaries. It is screwed onto your implants. You leave with a full smile. Then you heal for six to twelve months. During that time, your temporaries look good and function well. You eat normally. You smile confidently. Nobody knows they are temporary. Then you come back for trip two. That is when you get your permanent teeth. Zirconia if you want the premium option. Or acrylic, or Crystal Ultra, or nano ceramic.
Phase One costs five thousand four hundred ninety-nine dollars per arch. Total per arch with both phases is roughly eight to fifteen thousand dollars. Full mouth total is roughly fifteen to twenty-eight thousand dollars. So the difference between NuVia and Mexico is not the final result. It is the timeline.
NuVia gives you zirconia in twenty-four hours for forty-four to sixty-four thousand dollars full mouth. Mexico gives you excellent temporaries immediately and zirconia six to twelve months later for roughly fifteen to twenty-eight thousand dollars full mouth. Both get you to the same place. One costs three to four times as much.
PHASE |
NUVIA (US) |
SOTA DENTAL MEXICO |
|---|---|---|
The only difference: Timing. NuVia gives you zirconia in 24 hours. Mexico gives you zirconia in 6–12 months. Both get you to the same place.
COST ITEM |
NUVIA (US) |
SOTA DENTAL MEXICO |
|---|---|---|
That’s not a small difference. That’s life-changing money.
SOTA Dental’s PMMA temporaries are fixed to your implants. Not a removable denture. They look good, function well, and patients eat, smile, and live normally.
The question is: Is living with high-quality temporaries for 6–12 months worth saving $40,000+?
For most people: Yes.
OPTION |
WHAT YOU DO |
COST (FULL MOUTH) |
|---|---|---|
We have seen patients take a smart middle path.
Get the implant phase done at SOTA Dental for five thousand four hundred ninety-nine dollars per arch. Save the thirty to forty thousand dollars you would have spent at NuVia. Use a fraction of that savings for trip two zirconia. Pocket the rest. You end up with zirconia teeth. You just paid a fraction of the price.
And if you want to keep the surgery local, you can get implants placed by a US oral surgeon and fly to Mexico just for the final prosthetic. That hybrid approach still saves significant money.
We’ve talked to NuVia patients. Here’s what we hear:
NuVia patients are happy with the result. The difference is almost always financial — the NuVia patient paid $50k+ and is relieved it’s over. The Mexico patient paid $15k and is thrilled about the savings. Both have great teeth.
If you need permanent teeth in 24 hours and money is no object, yes. If you can wait 6–12 months and want the same result, Mexico gets you there for 20% of the cost.
Then NuVia’s advantage disappears. You’ll need grafting and healing time anyway — but you’re still paying the $22k–$32k premium price.
Some Mexican clinics offer faster zirconia turnaround. But the 24-hour permanent guarantee is NuVia’s signature. If that’s non-negotiable, NuVia is your answer.
NuVia is the only US option that guarantees permanent teeth in 24 hours. Mexico gives you excellent temporaries on day 1 — which look great in photos — but zirconia comes on trip 2.
No. It’s the same material from the same international suppliers. NuVia mills it in-house. Mexico labs use the same zirconia blanks. The material is identical.
NuVia delivers exactly what they promise. Permanent zirconia teeth in twenty-four hours. The process is legitimate. The results are excellent.
But the price is forty-four to sixty-four thousand dollars for a full mouth. And the only thing you are getting for that premium is speed.
If speed matters more than money, NuVia is your best US option. Hands down.
If you can live with high-quality temporaries for six to twelve months, Mexico gets you the same zirconia teeth, the same implants, and the same result for roughly fifteen to twenty-eight thousand dollars.
That is not a compromise. That is just a different timeline.
And if you can afford US treatment and want to stay home, there is nothing wrong with that either. NuVia is a strong option. Just make sure you know what you are paying for.
Contact SOTA Dental for a personalized treatment plan. No pressure. No upsells. Just the actual numbers.
Same Nobel Biocare implants · Same zirconia · Save $36,000+
* Based on 2026 pricing data from NuVia Dental Implant Center, ClearChoice, Aspen Dental, and SOTA Dental Mexico. Prices subject to change and individual case evaluation.
We update our price list monthly. Request this information by submitting your email address below. It will be sent to you immediately.
Updates related to accommodations and free stays for All-on-4 patients is done via text message only.
Request it below (optional).
"*" indicates required fields
